Monday, September 3, 2007

The Scarce Device?

Many of you are familiar with a ground-breaking piece of equipment invented by Greg Scace, the "Thermofilter." It's used by machine technicians and baristas to adjust their machines and their techniques to produce certain espresso brew temperatures. Greg's a modest guy, so he came up with that techy-sounding name, but everyone else simply calls it the "Scace Device." It has made a huge difference in enabling baristas all over the world to standardize their brewing temperature. Even though I'm not a barista or an espresso tech, I bought one soon after it became available and it's been really handy.

More recently, some attention has been paid to brew pressure as an important variable to be controlled and standardized. So Greg came up with another version of his device that simultaneously measured temperature AND pressure under actual brewing conditions. No one's going to call it the Thermofilter 2 -- it's going to be known as the "Scace 2."

But this time, I'm not going to buy one. Although it's an excellent value for a professional espresso person, I can't justify getting one for my occasional amateur use. So I came up with a flimsy version of my own that, combined with a bottomless portafilter, does a reasonably accurate job of measuring brew pressure under actual flow conditions.

After building it, like Greg, I had to come up with a name. Partly in Greg's honor, and partly because it's the only one in the world built exactly this way, I decided to call it:

"The SCARCE Device."

8 comments:

  1. Is the ramp up pressure rate close to what a coffee puck displays? I remember when building one of these I tried to make the inside chamber as close in volume as I could figure a normal PF with coffee in it would be. I used a cork filler base instead of what looks like PVC in a scace. Anyways, what do you use the quick release for? Maybe you're doing covert pressure readings, and folding it up in your pocket for a quick get away?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nice job. It should inspire others to do so

    ReplyDelete
  3. Could you enlighten us as to what fitting you used to go through the bottom of the blind basket?

    ReplyDelete
  4. All this testing with Scace devices is a bit diverging from what should be the central focus of it all... the taste of the espresso! In so many cases, people focus too much on the numbers and less on the taste.

    Assuming you have a decent, well maintained machine, and a barista who knows what s/he is doing, then preparing an excellent shot shouldn't be much harder than with a Scace.

    I think people who use Scace should ask themselves if they would use a computer to roast coffee (as opposed to roasting by the senses). If the answer is no, maybe they should reconsider whether their money is well spent on the Scace.

    ReplyDelete
  5. To Anonymous #1, see these pics:
    http://tinyurl.com/38nk44
    http://tinyurl.com/339tg2
    Here are Mcmaster.com part numbers:
    A. blind filter basket
    B. locknut with seal 5530K38
    C. inline filter 98355K841
    D. elbow 50785K43
    E. quick coupling 6534K56

    ReplyDelete
  6. To Anonymous #2:
    Of course the taste of the espresso is what matters. The Scace device is simply a way for baristas to calibrate their machines so that they can better compare their results. Maybe one uses it a few times a year. The rest of the time, you use your tastebuds. Everyone has to decide for themselves whether this is money well spent. For me, the answer is yes.

    ReplyDelete
  7. what happened to the podcast?

    ReplyDelete