Saturday, January 5, 2008

A humble wish for the year 20XX

The internet in 2008 gives us the ability to instantly share information about how we prepare our coffee with people around the world. As precision instrumentation becomes inexpensive and ubiquitous, this flow of information becomes more accurate and helpful.

Balances, for instance, help us measure how much dry coffee we use and how much liquid coffee ends up in our cup. Thermometers (or a Scace device) precisely measure our brew temperature. Digital timers allow us to record exactly how long the coffee and water are in contact. And water analyzers tell us our TDS and hardness.

Sharing this kind of data allows people on the other side of the globe to closely duplicate what we are doing. The give and take that results from this sharing encourages good techniques to spread and bad techniques to die out.

The one thing we DON'T have is a way to accurately communicate our grind fineness and particle distribution. Telling someone they can get a great Clover brew by grinding "halfway between presspot and drip" is better than nothing. But it's a lousy substitute for real measurement.

It won't happen in 2008, but I hope in the not-too-distant future we will have a $250 Laser Diffraction Particle Size Analyzer. Then folks in say, Seattle, will be able to tell folks in say, New Zealand exactly how fine they're grinding the Esmeralda to make the best cup on a Clover or Chemex or vacpot. And we'll be able to tell why the Robur tastes a little different from the Anfim. At that price I know I'll be buying one, and I bet James Hoffmann will be buying one, too!

8 comments:

  1. nice pic. why don't you build your own particle size analyzer? Tomas will help.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great idea. Would you mind telling Kevin that Tomas will be busy helping me for a couple years? Oh, also tell Kevin that the reason his DVD player isn't working is cuz we swiped the laser. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. if you agreed to give Kevin the patent i'm sure he would let you borrow Tomas. And now that he can download movies on iTunes he doesn't need his laser anyway...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Downloading movies [yawn]? Let me know when we can download COE coffees!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lasers are cool gear, but why not hire a Ph.D. lacky, buy a $75 microscope and have him measure out a representative sample?
    Also, this is a good science experiment for the young'ins.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Tim, it's not as easy as it sounds; small oily particles clump together and appear to be much larger particles under the scope.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Andys said:
    "Tim, it's not as easy as it sounds;"
    True, but plying Tomas with enough Drum tobacco to last two years wouldn't be a cakewalk, either! I'd bet the Ph.D. student with some lab experience (or even access to an academic lab) would be the most expedient way to go... You really could swing this into a "science in the real world" opportunity if you figure out which customer is the local chemistry teacher or lab tech...
    Go CSI on those grounds, Andy!
    IMHO, of course.

    ReplyDelete